MACBOOK USB C SUCKS HDMI PC
MACBOOK USB C SUCKS HDMI BLUETOOTH

Heck, USB generally sucks for storage until you find a matching pair of UAS (USB Attached SCSI) host controllers and drives (which are $$$). If you want to deal with big ass external arrays, Thunderbolt makes that all the more convenient. Thunderbolt also has the uncanny ability to hook up huge daisy chains of drives without losing too much speed between the first and last drive - most of the loss in speed comes from having more devices on the line than the actual order of them.

MACBOOK USB C SUCKS HDMI PC

Instead of crappy USB-to-serial adapters or parallel adapters that barely work, a Thunderbolt variant would work just like a real connector on your PC (and is practically driverless). Thunderbolt has several advantages over DockPort.ДЇirst, it's effectively PCIe - that should already start brewing ideas. Fortunately Apple doesn't generally listen to a bunch of whiners on slashdot. without eating a ridiculous amount of CPU power as required by USB.Дear god, do not drop Thunderbolt support based on the silly musings of a bunch of people buying the cheapest crap hardware they can possibly buy and then being pissy they don't have the same functionality. I come home (or go to the office) and plug in my laptop with single cable and instantly my displays, USB3 devices, audio and networking all work. Nothing Apple related about them.ДЄnd USB 3 does not do everything I use Thunderbolt for on my Mac, including ferry USB3 over the same wire as video. I have 2 generic servers in my closet that use Thunderbolt to talk to big ass arrays of disks. I guess the problem for wireless headphones is powering them requires too many batteries.

MACBOOK USB C SUCKS HDMI BLUETOOTH

It's interesting the headphone jack is still there since bluetooth chips are so cheap, easy to use, and are smaller than the headphone jack itself. So apple will make dongles to bridge the momentary time you need to bridge with legacy devices, then you will find everything new you buy is wireless. The same was true when apple dropped parallel ports and then Floppies. When they dropped the DVD I thought I'd miss it but oddly about the same time I stopped burning DVDs and started using thumb drives and DropBox only. Even when it's not around tethering to my phone was easier than reaching in the bag for the dongle and then finding a chair near an availble ethernet port. When they dropped the ethernet socket, I bought an ethernet dongle. Ethernet had become easy to find then next time I traveled. I figured I needed that for sure and bought a modem dongle but then found I never used it. I recall when apple dropped the modem socket. Apple just deprecates things slightly ahead of people realzing they soon won't need that. That is what Thunderbolt is intended for. Not to mention 3.0 which is still in the works.

Thunderbolt could already handle 3 of these in its first spec, and can handle more in the 2.0 version. Thunderbolt was created to bypass the need for the USB middle man, and provide direct access to the PCI-E bus for devices that could benefit from it, such as arrays of disks, analog video feeds, and other prosumer/business logic.ДЄ big thing USB 3.1 is touting is the ability to tie two SSDs together in a RAID 0 configuration and not max out its bandwidth. Thunderbolt is not a standard like Dockport, which requires you to use a display port to USB adapter to access USB devices, as it was never inteded for strictly that purpose. Thunderbolt 2 provide at least double that amount of power when it was released. In fact, one of the advantages of Thunderbolt when it first came out was providing twice as much power as the fastest USB at the time. This is simply not true.Д®ven if the specification did not provide power in and of itself, its use of the PCI-E bus does require it to provide power over its lanes.

For some reason, your post implies you think Thunderbolt does not supply power to its devices.

Macbook usb c sucks hdmi